EPISODE 19 OF "EVERYBODY HATES FREDDIE": EXPOSED AND NOWHERE TO HIDE!

I MUST'VE BEEN A REALLY GOOD GIRL TODAY, BECAUSE I GOT THIS FROM MY HUBBY, AFTER FINDING IT ON OUR CAR. SEEMS LIKE HAMAN IS NOW EXPOSED FOR ALL TO SEE, AND HE'S NOT LIKING IT. GEE, I WONDER WHY??

We as members of the emergency services in Bensalem have learned some very interesting information regarding the continuing attacks by Director of Public Safety Harran on the members of the Union Fire Company. Several members of the Bensalem Police Department have told us they only remember two times that the Director of Public Safety personally assigned investigations to members of the Detective unit.

1. When he assigned a detective to investigate former Chief Troisi for recklessly endangering the members of the paid fire department by refusing to give them water at a building fire. When Chief Troisi attempted to refute the charges and face his accusers, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY HARRAN THREATENED TO ARREST THE CHIEF FOR INTERFERING WITH A POLICE INVESTIGATION!! When it was discovered that the Union Fire Company did provide water to the paid fire department, you know, the same paid fire department that forgot to lay a supply line on a working building fire. The Director of Public Safety changed the charge to delaying the supply of water to the paid fire department. When outside agency witnesses came forward with evidence (including still and video) that the Union Fire Company immediately provided water to the paid fire company, the Director of Public Safety again changed his story to it was now a miscommunication. When the Chief tried to clear his and his fire company's name, the Director of Public Safety refused to provide the investigation information to the Chief or the Union Fire Company. There has been no written or verbal apology for the wrong doing by the Director of Public Safety to the Chief or the Union Fire Company. Director Harran then accused the Union Fire Company of being a danger to themselves, the emergency services and the public. He shut the fire company down claiming 18 safety points. The Director of Public Safety then refused for more than 3 months to provide the 18 safety points to the fire company to be addressed. The Mayor appointed an oversight committee to look into the safety concerns. They too refused to provide the 18 safety points to the fire company! When the Mayor finally ordered Director Harran to turn over the safety points, they were at best vague and nonspecific. An example of one of these safety points; "a Union Fire Company firefighter committed an unsafe act in September 2010". No further information or description! When confronted about the 18 safety points, the Director of Public Safety and the Mayor's handpicked oversight committee REFUSED to address the points stating they were moving forward, not looking back. If the 18 safety points were so serious, that the fire company had to be shut down, wouldn't you want to know if they were addressed by the fire company? Instead, the oversight committee focused on a fire boat the fire company purchased to improve safety for its members and the public and provide more service to the community AT NO ADDITIONAL COSTS to the community. Wish that could be said about the paid fire department. The Director of Public Safety forced two fire chiefs and two presidents from the fire company to resign so that the fire company could be re-opened. THERE WERE NO SAFETY ISSUES. From members of our group close with the members of Director Harran's inner circle, it was purely a vendetta by Mr. Harran against the Chief and the fire company. When told of this by several members of the public and elected officials in our township, the Mayor did nothing! We also learned that the detective assigned to the investigation of the Fire Chief for failing to give water to the paid fire company admitted the investigation came directly from Fred Harran. The detective never heard of such an investigation occurring before this one! Amazing! Maybe the Director of Public Safety should have spent more time ensuring that the detectives were investigating crimes against children, instead of harassing the fire company.

2. The second personally assigned investigation, was of the recently acquitted former assistant chief of the Union Fire Company. Not only was it confirmed by members of the police department, it was twice testified to in court. Fred Harran personally assigned the detective to investigate a fire chief that was injured fighting a fire at an industrial building in Bensalem. There were no eye witnesses claiming to have seen the fire chiefs hand severely injured before the fire, no medical witnesses or evidence stating that the fire chief had a pre-existing injury and conflicting testimony from the police officer who actually struck the fence several times with his patrol car, which resulted in the fire chief being injured!! The fire chief was charged with multiple felony charges. They harassed his family and friends, tried to intimidate members of the Union Fire Company claiming; "if you don't admit seeing his hand injured before the fire, we are going to lock you up for hindering our investigation" failed to interview witnesses who were at the fire location, and saw the chief get injured. They searched his father's house looking for him. The father, who was also the chief of the Union Fire Company had a handgun on his person inside his house at the time of the search, told the Bristol police officers that he had the gun on his person. He turned the gun over to the Bristol officers. There were two Bensalem detectives there for the search. After the search which resulted in not finding the assistant fire chief in the house, the Bristol officers returned the loaded handgun to the fire chief. Later, Fred Harran asked the Bristol police officers to arrest the fire chief for threatening his detectives with the gun! If he did threaten them with the gun, wouldn't they have arrested him right there? If it was true, why would the Bristol officers hand the gun back to the fire chief? At the hearing at Judge Brown's court, they told the assistant chief that if he pleads guilty, they would not arrest his father for threatening the detectives with his handgun! The assistant Chief refused. At the hearing in Judge Brown's court, the representative from the Workmen's Compensation insurer stated that the only reason they stopped payments to the assistant chief was because her company received a letter from Fred Harran telling them to stop payments! There was no evidence to support this claim by Fred Harran that the insurance company was aware of, and none was provided to the insurance company, by Fred Harran. At this hearing, an employee of Knights Collision, which most if not all of its business comes from towing vehicles for the Bensalem police and specifically for its Special Investigations Unit claimed that that the assistant chief who also worked at Knights Collision was injured weeks earlier. The police officer who was at the scene of the fire, claimed that he had opened the gate with his vehicle BEFORE the fire company got to the fire, and that there was no way the assistant chief could have hurt his hand opening the gate. At the trial in Doylestown, this same officer admitted that the assistant fire chief was there, and in fact he had been standing next to the assistant chief trying to help open the gate he had rammed with his police car! Lacking any real evidence, the detective "found" a member of another fire company with some information. This member claimed that he was at a memorial service for 9/11 in September of 2011 at the township building. He supposedly overheard a conversation between the assistant chief and another person. The assistant chief claimed during that conversation that he hurt his hand. This was prior to the fire that the assistant chief was injured at. After the fire, this same firefighter was told by one of his fire company chiefs that the assistant chief was injured at the building fire. This firefighter could not remember the weather conditions or anything else about the memorial service. But when he was contacted 9 months later by the detective assigned by Fred Harran, he remembered overhearing the assistant chief's conversation! This same firefighter admitted that there were 400-500 people at the event. He could remember nothing else about the event EXCEPT the conversation between the assistant chief and the other person! Needless to say it took the judge less than 1 hour to find the assistant chief not guilty! When Director Harran found out that the assistant chief was found not guilty, he was VERY upset. He told several members of the police department, and anyone else within ear shot, that the assistant district attorney did a terrible job, and that he did not present the case well. Maybe, Mr. Harran he presented what you provided: NOTHING. Imagine, if only you would have put the time and effort into the seven years the sexual assault cases on children by that animal, that Bristol finally arrested, which laid dormant in your detective unit, 18 additional victims could have been prevented! And this is just the tip of the iceberg! We have not forgotten the paid firefighter who attacked a volunteer firefighter in our township, damaged his vehicle and required the victim to be transported to the hospital for medical treatment. Where were you to personally assign a detective to that case? There were witnesses, evidence and medical reports, but NO warrant, posting of his face on a billboard in Philadelphia, searches of his house, or harassment of his family and friends. Absolutely nothing! In fact, he is still a member of the paid fire company! What about the other member of the paid fire company that sent pictures of his genitals to several female members of the emergency services? Nope, nothing there either. Mr. Harran have you contacted FEMA, the FBI or anyone else regarding the fraudulently obtained SAFER grant? Nope, nothing there either.

3. Some very interesting information concerning the failure to prevent additional victims of the predator that Bristol arrested. One lieutenant, one, now deputy director of public safety, and five sergeants who were supposed to be supervising the one detective assigned to that case, ALL FAILED to note the lack of progress for over 7 years, and did nothing! Not one word in or out of the police department about their failure to discover these cases sitting dormant! It took Bristol Police to discover these cases and get the predator off the street! Doesn't say much for the Bensalem Police, does it??

LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT, HAMAN. YOU FALSELY ACCUSE A MAN OF WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION FRAUD, FALSELY ACCUSE HIS FATHER OF THREATENING YOUR PRECIOUS DETECTIVES WITH A GUN, DEFAME AN HONORABLE FIRE HOUSE BY MAKING EQUALLY FALSE ACCUSATIONS, UNLAWFULLY SHUTTING IT DOWN TWICE, (TRIED TO MAKE IT PERMANENT THE SECOND TIME, BUT FAILED.), AND INSTEAD OF OWNING UP TO YOUR SIN, YOU MAKE EXCUSES?? YOU WASTE TOWNSHIP AND COUNTY TIME AND MONEY DOING THIS, FAIL, AND THEN HAVE THE NERVE TO BADMOUTH THE ASSISTANT DA ON THIS, WHEN YOU KNOW, YOU GAVE THE MAN FALSE INFORMATION?? WOW!! YOU HAVE BEEN CAUGHT IN LIES BEFORE, BUT NOT LIKE THIS. THIS TIME, YOU'VE BEEN CAUGHT FOR ALL OF BENSALEM, AND BUCKS COUNTY TO SEE. I ESPECIALLY FIND IT INTERESTING, HOW YOU RELIED ON A COMPANY, AND OWNER, WITH TOWNSHIP CONNECTIONS UP THE WAZOO, AND HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF SHADY BUSINESS DEALINGS BY OTHERS, TO FALSELY ACCUSE THIS POOR YOUNG MAN. THE OTHER WITNESS IN THIS, IS ALSO ALLEGEDLY A DRUG INFORMANT, WITH A CONTINUED ADDICTION, AND YOU USED THIS PERSON TO LIE FOR YOU!! I ALSO THINK IT'S REPREHENSIBLE THAT YOU INTIMIDATED AND THREATENED PEOPLE, WITH THREATS OF ARREST, INTO LYING FOR YOU, BUT IT EVIDENTLY BACKFIRED, BECAUSE THEY TOLD THE TRUTH!

WHAT BURNS ME EVEN MORE ON THIS, IS THAT YOU DID ALL OF THIS, WHEN YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN INVESTIGATING REAL CRIMES!! YOU KNOW, LIKE MEYERLE, YOUR TWO PRIZED PAID FIRE FIGHTERS, (GROW, AND YOUR STOOGE RUGGERIO, A.K.A. "MR. CELL PHONE"), AND MUCH MORE!!

GEE, I WONDER WHAT THE PRESS AND THE NEW PA ATTORNEY GENERAL WILL THINK OF THIS???

REMEMBER NUMBERS 32:23 HAMAN!!